Peer Review Process

Upon receiving a manuscript, our editorial team conducts a preliminary assessment. If it meets the basic criteria, the submission proceeds to a blind review stage to ensure objective evaluation.

• Originality: Research must present new insights and valuable contributions.
• Relevance: Work should advance understanding within its academic field.
• Structure and Clarity: Submissions should be well-organized and clearly written, including all essential sections.
• Quality of Writing: Professional language and coherent argumentation are required.
• Data and References: Claims must be supported by accurate data and proper citations.

Expert reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommend whether to accept the manuscript as is, accept with revisions, or reject the submission.

Reviewers annotate manuscripts with feedback, which authors then use to revise their work. This collaborative process ensures constructive dialogue and improvement.

Every published work is clearly marked as peer-reviewed. Our transparent policies ensure that the process is rigorous, unbiased, and timely.

After thorough evaluation and revision, accepted manuscripts move to production. Our open-access policy guarantees that high-quality research reaches a global audience.